Dead Fish + Pussy + Tits = Restricted
« previous entry | next entry »
May. 14th, 2008 | 03:41 am
This, in my opinion is the kind of photo people should be moderating, in fact I rated this as Restricted, because it has boobs, punani and suggestive dead fish. However, I wouldn't consider rating this photo as Restricted, even though it too has boobs and punani.
According to the email I get from Flickr, I should, "Use [my] common sense about whether or not [my] content is suitable for a global, public audience. If the answer is
no, [I] need to filter it from public view." But what if my common sense is different from someone else's? I don't believe that this photo needs to be marked as Restricted, but I'm right, right? That photo should be rated as Moderate? But what about this one? I don't even believe that that should be marked as Moderate. Should it be?
I don't know, I guess I'm just sour because almost my entire stream should apparently be marked as Moderate or Restricted and then I lose a lot of views. Oh well. People should just learn to turn their SafeSearch off.
It sucks though, that if a person isn't logged into Flickr that they can't see ANY of my photos. Well, except one. Which isn't even a photo of mine, it's a screenshot.
Also, when looking at the safety filter descriptions, Moderate is described as ,"Some of the things you upload may be considered offensive by some people. " I don't think any of the stuff I upload is offensive. Well, except maybe this photo, but it's more just...gross. And then for Restricted it says, "Your photostream is unsuitable for children, your grandmother or your workmates." Well, I don't want my grandma seeing my boobs, but I don't mind if someone else's grandma does. And I don't mind if my co-workers do either. So should my boobs be restricted? Goddamn.